I think it is less about inserting into the case (or having an artifact) and more about social media attention. "Look at me! I was chosen!" is a common theme on any given day.
In the letter you see "my jail cell" His whole life in the past 3+ months is not to go to jail!!!! Every second od every day, every breath, every heart beat. He is a pre-trail detention. He is not in jail. He would not call it jail. He hasn't been convinced and sentenced. He wouldn't call it jail. For most it may only seem like semantics, not for him!
You questioned it, and then you didn’t care to validate the aspects you were questioning? What was the purpose of questioning then? I sent you a message when you published this to inform you that two of the things you were questioning (inmate number format and stamp) were also the same exact way in a letter I had personally verified from around the same time and you chose to ignore that message - since it was information contrary to what you believed led this letter to be inauthentic.
The letter has no creases from being folded.
You're right. Great eye!
You’re comparing what looks like a scanned image to photographs of letters. Creases don’t always show up in a scanned image.
it was photocopied
https://www.luigimangioneinfo.com/
KFA (Luigi’s NYC lawyer) has confirmed that this letter in question is AUTHENTIC.
I think it is less about inserting into the case (or having an artifact) and more about social media attention. "Look at me! I was chosen!" is a common theme on any given day.
Yep, it's a "Pick me!" thing. Pathetic, really
Great analysis with the 'so' observation. I found that part 100% compelling.
1,3 & 5 are fake, imo
In the letter you see "my jail cell" His whole life in the past 3+ months is not to go to jail!!!! Every second od every day, every breath, every heart beat. He is a pre-trail detention. He is not in jail. He would not call it jail. He hasn't been convinced and sentenced. He wouldn't call it jail. For most it may only seem like semantics, not for him!
I still haven’t gotten a reply from my letter in January. Oh well
Can you share more detail about how the letter you mentioned at the end of the article was 'debunked'? I have not seen anything about this.
Nope. Ashley can go right another note or another article about it if she'd like. I'm not embarrassed because I questioned something.
You questioned it, and then you didn’t care to validate the aspects you were questioning? What was the purpose of questioning then? I sent you a message when you published this to inform you that two of the things you were questioning (inmate number format and stamp) were also the same exact way in a letter I had personally verified from around the same time and you chose to ignore that message - since it was information contrary to what you believed led this letter to be inauthentic.